|
|
You've probably been hearing quite a bit about how Bill Clinton destroyed the Democratic Party.
This bit of fluff-turned-fact is offered up primarily from the right where you'll hear a steady drumbeat of punditry hammering home how the Clinton legacy of "corruption and dishonor" permanently smeared a once-great party.
To some, Bill Clinton is the most reviled president of modern times. Even many opponents of George W. Bush, among whom I count myself, have trouble matching the virulence with which Mr. Clinton was hated by the Republican Party. To this day, the right continues to propagate the story that Clinton forever tarnished his party and that his successors inherited only a flawed bequest of electoral disaster.
Unfortunately, even some on the left have picked up the idea, altering it to say Clinton wasn't liberal enough, that his moderation drove a GOP agenda into power.
So is either side right? Let's look at the facts about Clinton's alleged ruination of the Democratic Party. Judge for yourself whether Clinton's brand of progressive centrism was a workable formula or a terrible mistake.
|
|
A lot of red-to-blue shifts wouldn't you say? But surely if Clinton was the disaster the Republicans paint him to be the GOP must have gotten some folks headed the other way during those eight tumultuous years. In all my research I found only one blue-to-red shift. Just one. West Virginia with its five electoral votes went from Democratic to Republican. That's it. We got California, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Vermont, Washington, Maine and Oregon. They got West Virginia. We got 147 electors and gave up 5. Not a bad trade, eh?
Hmm ... it doesn't look like Bill Clinton's legacy to the party was all that bad to me. So why are the Republicans so determined even now, years later, to tell the Democrats about all the awful things he did to them? Why is it that President Clinton is still smeared so mightily so often by so many?
The answer to that is obvious. What's less obvious is why Democrats let the GOP get away with such rank silliness. We should be proud of our president, his balanced budgets, his economic boom and most of all the fact that he worked to help ordinary folks and they responded by resurrecting the morbund Democratic Party that had been losing elections since Adlai Stevenson accepted the nomination.
Clinton was far from perfect of course - personally and politically. Like other men he made his share of goofs. Only a fool believes totally in the infallability of any man. But Democrats should be proud to push an agenda of fiscal responsibility, a progressive tax system, economic stimulus and a workable healthcare system.
Clinton's populist centrism, his middle left roots and the way they reinvigorated the Democratic Party all represent the biggest threat to the GOP since Roosevelt. If the Democratic Party ever learns the lessons Bill Clinton taught it about the success of pursuing a course of moderate, responsible progressivism, the Republicans are cooked - and they know it.
That's why they hate Clinton so much - and why they fear him.
|